ABOUT
  • The UK's dedicated running injury site, fuelling your recovery with essential recovery info and great deals on all things running

Did The Army Just Help Disprove The ‘Heel-Striking Myth’?

By on Jun 6, 2014

New research suggests that runners who strike the ground heel-first are no more prone to overuse injuries than those who do not, writes Laird Harrison for Medscape.com.

Results from the new study, based on US Army personnel, were presented at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine. The conclusion is clear, according to Dr Bradley Warr, co-author of the paper (Footstrike Patterns do not Influence Running Related Overuse Injuries in U.S. Army Soldiers).

The bottom line is that we need to be very cautious changing someone’s running style.

A similar conclusion was reached by Craig Payne at RunResearchJunkie.com, given the results from other studies on the heel-striking issue.

There are no systematic differences in the injury rates when comparing heel vs midfoot/forefoot strikers or barefoot/minimalist vs shod when running.

An end to the ‘heel-striking myth’?

Other experts were less convinced. Harrison notes the thoughts of Irene Davis, director of the Spaulding National Running Center at Harvard University. The advocate of barefoot running questioned various aspects of the study, such as its retrospective nature and the fact that the injuries were self-reported.

She also was unconvinced by the sample involved, given that many of the soldiers did not run a great deal.

I think that’s a big flaw of that study.

More reading on heel-striking and running injuries

More on this story below; click here for daily running new updates and click here for breaking news.

 REPORT
3 items   1 followers   0 votes   233 views

New research for runners on the 'heel-striking myth'

What interesting new research tells us about running, heel-striking and injuries

Source: http://www.runninginjury.co.uk/community/heel-striking-myth-army/

Jun 03, 2014 - journals.lww.com - 35
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Purpose: This retrospective study tests if runners who habitually forefoot strike have different rates of injury than runners who habitually rearfoot strike. Methods: We measured the strike characteristics of middle- and long-distance runners from a collegiate cross-country team and quantified their history of injury, including the incidence and rate of specific injuries, the severity of each injury, and the rate of mild, moderate, and severe injuries per mile run.

Jun 03, 2014 - youtube.com - 38
Shod Heel Strike Running with Force - Close-Up, Slow Motion

This is the ground reaction force generated when heel strike running in shoes. Notice that this force trace has the impact transient characteristic of heel strikes (a nearly instantaneous, large force experienced at impact when heel striking). Shoes do reduce this impact force when heel striking, but does not eliminate it.

Jun 03, 2014 - runresearchjunkie.com - 40
Another study on foot strike pattern and running injuries

Guess what it found? We already know that the preponderance of evidence probably shows that there is no systematic differences in the injury rates when comparing heel vs midfoot/forefoot strikers or barefoot/minimalist vs shod when running. Now we have this new study to add to that.

Virgin Active free gym membership

LIKE MORE?

We respect your email privacy

Get access nowPS This is the easy way to gain access on a mobile - click the button above, then hit send when the email pops up. Job done.

Share your thoughts

More in video
153 Seconds of Running Injury Prevention
153 Seconds of Running Injury Prevention

With a nod to runners preparing for upcoming marathons, Paul Hobrough and Mike Antoniades offer their thoughts on strengthening your...

Close